Warm weather means more fishing, but in the Bay of Plenty there’s still concerns to be addressed for snapper. Stocks are classified as “collapsed” and so LegaSea will be calling for specific action to be taken in the Bay.
This is one of a few focus areas for LegaSea as a result of Nathan Guy’s decisions on the future of the Snapper 1 fishery.
We’ve reviewed the hundreds of pages of documents released after the snapper decision and have a clear view of how we can best serve to push for more positive outcomes in the Snapper 1 fishery.
“We will not be taking the Minister to court for his Snapper 1 decision.”
The New Zealand Sport Fishing Council
In essence, the majority aspects of the decision made will lead to positive outcomes for the fishery, and four out of five aspects of this decision were favourable for the people of New Zealand. While the merits of his decision to reduce our bag limits and increase minimum size limits may be unfair, (and we do disagree with this aspect of the decision) this does not lead to an automatic ability for judicial review.
Having considered a review, we believe a greater impact can be made by focusing on other activities and action. Such as:
Given the political nature of fisheries and especially the election next year, LegaSea will seize this opportunity to effect change. The team is available to work with all political parties, to develop strong fisheries policy to ensure that decision-makers have clear frameworks that balance cause and effect of fisheries decision, on the people of New Zealand and on our marine resources, and not just economic outcomes.