QMS FAQs

All FAQs | Customary Fisheries | Fisheries Management | maximum sustainable yield | QMS | Economics | Fishing | Rescue Fish | Environment | Fishing methods | Recreational Fishing | Fishcare | customary | Kahawai | Reform scam | Baitfish | Scallops | Crayfish | WRC decision | Marlin | Reef fish | Deemed value penalties | Judicial Review | Kill the Bill | Tarakihi | Release mortality | Election | Politics | Bottom trawling

Will thousands of Kiwis lose their jobs if we transition away from bottom trawling?

October 14, 2026 Not if the transition is done well. A well-designed transition plan would support commercial fishers to change their fishing practices to more selective methods. Some jobs may disappear however, the goal is to revitalise small-scale fishing operations in the regions so more jobs will be available to families and coastal communities. A thriving inshore fleet ... Read more.
QMS | Fishing methods | Bottom trawling

Will transitioning away from bottom trawling in our coastal fisheries make fish more expensive?

October 14, 2026 Unlikely. The capture method only has a small influence on the retail price of fish. The majority of the retail sale price is influenced and captured by the quota owner, who then leases out the catch entitlement to fishers on the water. Those fishers make relatively low returns yet have higher costs in fuel, crew, ... Read more.
QMS | Fishing methods | Bottom trawling

Would replacing the Quota Management System make fish more expensive?

October 7, 2026 Unlikely, because fishers will be able to sell their fish directly to the public without having to pay lease costs to the quota landlord. Under the New Zealand Sport Fishing Council’s and LegaSea’s alternative policy, Rescue Fish, Ika Rauora, fish could become more affordable for everyday Kiwis. This is because it would remove quota ownership, ... Read more.
QMS | Rescue Fish

Why can’t we buy fresh fish straight off fishers’ boats?

October 7, 2026 Under the Quota Management System, many inshore fishers lease their catching rights from quota owners, on the condition that they must sell their catch back to that quota owner. This leaves fishers little freedom to sell directly to the public. Unless they have a special permit, they can only sell up to 10 kilos of ... Read more.
QMS

What is a slipper skipper?

October 7, 2026 A slipper skipper is a quota owner who never goes to sea and collects profits without ever touching the water. Instead of fishing themselves, they lease their catching rights to the fishers who do the hard work.
QMS

Why does LegaSea want political parties to investigate alternatives to the QMS?

October 1, 2026 The Quota Management System (QMS) has concentrated and privatised control of our fisheries to a handful of major quota owners. This has had a detrimental impact on our fish, the fishers, Māori and our coastal communities.  We need a system that removes private property rights, incentivises selective, low-impact fishing methods, and puts the health and ... Read more.
QMS

How many species are in the Quota Management System?

April 15, 2026 Over time, 98 species or species groups have been added to the QMS. For example, tarakihi was added to the QMS in 1986, kahawai in 2004. These are divided into 642 separate fish stocks i.e For snapper, there are six different snapper stocks across the country – SNA 1 (Northland, Hauraki Gulf, Bay of Plenty), ... Read more.
Fisheries Management | QMS

Does the deemed value penalty system work?

February 19, 2026 No. LegaSea and the New Zealand Sport Fishing Council have submitted many times that the deemed value system is not working. It’s not fair on smaller operators if larger operators, who hold a lot of Annual Catch Entitlement (ACE), will not release it. This encourages dumping, which is not good for the small-scale operator, nor ... Read more.
Deemed value penalties | Fisheries Management | QMS | Reform scam

Why is reducing deemed value penalties a problem?

February 19, 2026 Deemed value penalties are supposed to be a deterrent to prevent commercial fishers from exceeding lawful catch limits. If these penalties are reduced, it will encourage ongoing catches beyond sustainable limits, weakening protections for fish stocks. The cost of commercial fishers catching more than they are legally allowed would instead be treated as an acceptable ... Read more.
Fisheries Management | QMS | Reform scam | Deemed value penalties

Does the money from deemed value penalties get reinvested into managing our fisheries?

February 19, 2026 No. The money collected from deemed value penalties goes into the Government’s Consolidated Fund. There is no requirement that deemed value revenue is reinvested into fisheries management expenses such as enforcement, monitoring, stock assessments and fisheries science.
QMS | Reform scam | Deemed value penalties | Fisheries Management