Reform scam FAQs
All FAQs |
Customary Fisheries | Fisheries Management | maximum sustainable yield | QMS | Economics | Fishing | Rescue Fish | Environment | Fishing methods | Recreational Fishing | Fishcare | customary | Kahawai | Reform scam | Baitfish | Scallops | Crayfish | WRC decision | Marlin | Reef fish | Deemed value penalties
February 19, 2026
No. LegaSea and the New Zealand Sport Fishing Council have submitted many times that the deemed value system is not working. It’s not fair on smaller operators if larger operators, who hold a lot of Annual Catch Entitlement (ACE), will not release it. This encourages dumping, which is not good for the small-scale operator, nor ... Read more.
February 19, 2026
Deemed value penalties are supposed to be a deterrent to prevent commercial fishers from exceeding lawful catch limits. If these penalties are reduced, it will encourage ongoing catches beyond sustainable limits, weakening protections for fish stocks. The cost of commercial fishers catching more than they are legally allowed would instead be treated as an acceptable ... Read more.
February 19, 2026
No. The money collected from deemed value penalties goes into the Government’s Consolidated Fund. There is no requirement that deemed value revenue is reinvested into fisheries management expenses such as enforcement, monitoring, stock assessments and fisheries science.
February 19, 2026
Deemed value penalties are meant to work like a fine, a financial incentive that encourages fishers to stay within lawful catch limits. The penalty is supposed to be high enough to encourage responsible fishing, but low enough to discourage dumping of unwanted catch overboard.
February 19, 2026
Deemed value penalties are financial penalties commercial fishers are required to pay when they catch more fish than they are legally allowed. Commercial fishers must acquire Annual Catch Entitlements (ACE) to cover the fish they catch. If they catch more fish than they have ACE, they must buy more ACE. If they cannot source enough ... Read more.
May 30, 2025
The Minister is calling the proposals a reform package, claiming that they will improve responsiveness, efficiency and certainty of how our fisheries are managed. The proposed changes are not reforms. They are merely changes to improve quota owners’ interests at the expense of the public, the marine environment and small-scale fishers. Real reforms require meaningful ... Read more.
May 30, 2025
The reforms will make it easier for quota owners to access and export our fish by reducing regulations, fast-tracking decisions and weakening sustainability safeguards. It also means quota owners can decide how much fish is caught during the year, a statutory function normally exercised by the Minister.
May 30, 2025
They could have a big impact on recreational fishing and access to our most popular species. The proposals mean that commercial fishers get to determine how much fish is caught, where and when. The Minister is the only person with a statutory duty to limit catches and make sure there is enough fish in the ... Read more.
May 30, 2025
Commercial fishing industry representatives spent a year developing a wishlist of changes. The Minister directed Fisheries New Zealand to work with the Seafood Industry Forum to develop a proposal package for public consultation. Recreational fishing and environmental representatives were deliberately not invited to participate in those discussions.
May 30, 2025
If successful some of the proposals will weaken environmental protections designed to protect the productivity and biodiversity of marine waters. These protection measures have been built up over many years after a lot of advocacy by recreational fishing organisations and other eNGOs. It will also mean less fish in the water. The proposals do not ... Read more.
